California Politics and Public Policy
Course Description
Why is California—the world’s fifth-largest economy and the undisputed vanguard of progressive policy—so frequently paralyzed by the very crises it seeks to solve? How can a state with supermajorities committed to climate action, racial equity, and public investment struggle so acutely to build affordable housing, construct clean transit, prevent catastrophic megafires, resolve structural water deficits, and manage extreme inequality?
This course examines California government and public policy through the dynamic analytical tension between two foundational contemporary frameworks:
- The Polycrisis Thesis (Adam Tooze): Shocks across climate, housing, public health, energy, and municipal finance are no longer isolated events; they are deeply entangled, compounding, and mutually reinforcing. The whole is more volatile and dangerous than the sum of its parts.
- The Abundance Agenda (Ezra Klein & Derek Thompson): Progressive governance suffers from an institutional "vetocracy" and "everything-bagel liberalism"—where procedural hurdles, environmental review litigation (CEQA), local zoning vetoes, and fragmented bureaucracy manufacture artificial scarcity.
To evaluate these competing diagnostics, we anchor our policy debates in Deborah Stone’s Policy Paradox—contrasting the rationalist Market Model with the Polis Model—while mastering the structural mechanics of state and local institutions using the Open Oregon Educational Resource textbook.
Career Pathways in Political Science
This course develops skills applicable to five core career pathways:
- Law & Government: Law school, courts, legislative offices, public administration, campaigns. (Example: Legislative Aide for a State Senator)
- International & Global Affairs: Diplomacy, NGOs, human rights, international organizations, foreign service. (Example: Foreign Service Officer for the State Department)
- Policy & Research: Think tanks, policy institutes, government analysis, program evaluation. (Example: Policy Analyst at a Non-Partisan Think Tank)
- Community Development & Advocacy: Nonprofits, advocacy, community organizing, civic engagement. (Example: Community Organizer for a Regional Housing Advocacy Group)
- Pre-Law & JD/Legal Professions: LSAT preparation and fellowships, legal and paralegal internships, law school readiness. (Example: Assistant Public Defender)
Prerequisite Knowledge or Coursework
None.
Textbooks
- State & Local Government Nuts and Bolts (Free OER): Simon, Christopher A., et al. State and Local Government and Politics: An Open Oregon Educational Resource (3rd Edition). Oregon State University.
- Policy Theory & The Polis: Stone, Deborah. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making [Book/Library] (W. W. Norton & Co.).
- All other readings online or on canvas.
- California Policy Dashboard & California Policy Workbook.
Program Learning Outcomes
- Demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of political institutions, processes, and theories.
- Analyze complex political phenomena using appropriate methodological and theoretical frameworks.
- Communicate political analyses effectively in both written and oral formats.
Student Learning Outcomes
Upon completion of the course, the student should be able to:
- Analyze the institutional architecture of California state and local government, including the legislature, executive, judiciary, and direct democracy mechanisms.
- Evaluate contemporary California policy challenges through the competing theoretical frameworks of the "Polycrisis" and the "Abundance Agenda."
- Apply Deborah Stone’s Polis and Market models to dissect real-world policy battles over housing, climate, water, and public finance.
- Formulate evidence-based policy recommendations and articulate them through academic writing, memos, and legislative simulations.
Course Format & Delivery
This course spans a duration of 16 weeks and convenes three times a week on campus. The scheduled class sessions are held on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays, excluding campus holidays. The course materials, readings, and assignment submissions will be managed via the Canvas platform. Active participation in daily debates and simulations is a core component of the in-person experience.
Course Assignments
Below is a summary of the assignments for this course. Please note that as part of your coursework, you will also complete the California Policy Podcast Project. In this assignment, you will step into the shoes of a policy journalist to interview a practitioner working in a policy advocacy organization within one of California's distinct regions. You'll research their recent work, conduct a 45-minute interview, and record it as a podcast episode that bridges their regional work to our local context in Ventura County.
| Assignment Type & Title | Description | Points | % of Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seminar Participation, Daily Debates, & Attendance | Active, informed contributions in seminar discussions, simulations, breakout analysis, and regular attendance. | 10 | 10% |
| California Policy Podcast Project | Research and record a 45-minute interview with a regional policy practitioner. | 25 | 25% |
| Friday Workbook | In-class policy advocacy workbook completed on Fridays starting Week 2. Graded pass/fail (1 pt each). | 15 | 15% |
| Midterm Examination | Institutional mechanics IDs + theoretical essay on Market vs. Polis and Polycrisis vs. Abundance. | 25 | 25% |
| Final Examination | Comprehensive exam similar to the midterm, covering institutional mechanics and theoretical course frameworks. | 25 | 25% |
Course Grading Policy
Student work will be graded based on analytical rigor, integration of course concepts, clarity of writing, and empirical accuracy. Grading rubrics for the Final Examination are available in Canvas. Students can expect to receive feedback on reading memos within one week of submission, and within two weeks for major papers.
| Score Range | Letter | Score Range | Letter |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 93% | A | 73% to 76% | C |
| 90% to 92% | A- | 70% to 72% | C- |
| 87% to 89% | B+ | 67% to 69% | D+ |
| 83% to 86% | B | 63% to 66% | D |
| 80% to 82% | B- | 60% to 62% | D- |
| 77% to 79% | C+ | <60% | F |
Attendance Policy
Attendance and active participation are essential components of this seminar-style course and account for 10% of your total grade. Missing more than three unexcused classes will negatively impact your participation score. In the event of illness or an anticipated absence, please email the instructor prior to class to make necessary arrangements. Regardless of whether an absence is excused, students are responsible for all material covered and assignments due. Accurate attendance records are maintained for all class sessions.
Late Policy
Assignments submitted after the deadline will incur a 10% penalty for each day they are late. Assignments more than five days late will not be accepted without prior authorization. If you are facing extenuating circumstances, please contact the instructor before the deadline to discuss a potential extension.
Device and AI Policy
Following the pedagogical model recently adopted by the University of Chicago’s Social Sciences Core, this course is designed as an "analog" environment. We strongly believe that equipping students to read, write, and think independently—without dependence on artificial intelligence or constant digital distraction—is essential to evaluating the complex problems of California governance.
- Device-Free Classroom: The use of laptops, tablets, and smartphones is generally prohibited during class. Our seminars will rely on device-free, guided discussions to afford students the freedom to think for themselves and engage in good faith, face-to-face, without the cacophony of disembodied voices. For students who prefer digital notes, we recommend taking handwritten notes and using free OCR (Optical Character Recognition) apps after class to transcribe them. Excellent free options include Microsoft Lens, Google Drive, or the built-in document scanner in Apple Notes.
- AI Tool Usage: You are welcome to use artificial intelligence tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Claude) to brainstorm ideas, clarify concepts, or improve your general understanding of the material. However, the use of AI to write, draft, or complete any graded assignments is strictly prohibited. Human engagement and human expertise remain central to the core work of this class.
Exceptions to the device-free norm may occasionally be carved out by the instructor for specific purposes, such as collectively examining tabulations in a dataset or accessing specific library resources. If you need an accommodation to use technology due to a disability, please contact Disability Support Services (DSS) so we can arrange the appropriate modifications.
Technical Skills and Technology Required
Please refer to the Student Resources section in Canvas for a description of general technology requirements. For this course, students will also need access to basic word processing software and the ability to navigate online state databases (such as the LAO and PPIC websites).
University Policies and Resources
Note: All course readings, as well as the California Politics Workbook, will be available online.
Visit the Student Resources site in Canvas for links to relevant university policies and resources, including information about academic support, student support, and library services.
- Classroom Environment: Discussions in this course touch upon contested political values, economic distributions, and identity. We will maintain an intellectually rigorous, respectful environment where students can critique policy arguments, assumptions, and institutional outcomes constructively.
- Accommodations: California Lutheran University is committed to providing reasonable accommodations to students with documented disabilities. Contact the Center for Academic Resources at the start of the semester to coordinate accommodations.
- Academic Integrity: Plagiarism and uncredited AI generation of written submissions will result in an F on the assignment and referral to the academic conduct board. All academic arguments must cite evidence and original sources accurately.
Addendum
Carnegie Hour Table (For 4-Credit Class - 15 Weeks + Finals)
| Activity | Instructor-Led (Weekly) | Instructor-Led (Course) | Independent (Weekly) | Independent (Course) | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In-Person Class Sessions | 3.0 | 45.0 | Seminars (Mon, Wed, Fri for 15 weeks) | ||
| Course Readings | 4.0 | 60.0 | Reading average of 4 hours/week | ||
| California Policy Podcast Project | 10.0 | Interview and recording preparation | |||
| Friday Workbook | 14.0 | In-class weekly workbook assignments | |||
| Midterm Exam Prep & Exam | 1.0 | 1.0 | 15.0 | Midterm examination | |
| Final Examination & Prep | 2.0 | 2.0 | 15.0 | Final examination session | |
| TOTAL HOURS | 48.0 | 132.0 | Total Course Hours = 180 |
Week 1: The Polycrisis and the Abundance Agenda
- Syllabus overview
- Required:
- Read: Adam Tooze, "What is a polycrisis? Historian Adam Tooze explains" (World Economic Forum, 2023)
- Listen: Adam Tooze on the Polycrisis (Podcast)
- discussion slides
- ***Discussion Prompt:** How does the concept of a "polycrisis" differ from simply facing multiple separate problems simultaneously?*
- Required:
- Read: Derek Thompson, "A Simple Plan to Solve All of America’s Problems: The Abundance Agenda" (*The Atlantic*, 2022)
- Watch: The Abundance Agenda (YouTube)
- discussion Slides
- ***Discussion Prompt:** Is California’s primary governance problem a lack of progressive values, or a failure of the state’s capacity to build?*
Week 2: The Market, the Polis, Equity, and Efficiency
- Required:
- **Stone**, Chapter 1 ("The Market and the Polis")
- Read: The road to housing in California runs through the federal government (CalMatters)
- Discussion Slides
- Case Study: Housing & Homelessness
- ***Discussion Prompt:** How does federalism constrain California's ability to solve its affordable housing crisis locally, and how does the Polis conceptualize 'equity' in housing access compared to the Market?*
- Required:
- Chapter 2 ("Equity").
- Discussion Slides
- Case Study: Core Issue 1: Systemic Supply Shortages, Zoning Failures, and Market Interventions
- ***Discussion Prompt:** In Stone's terms, how did Prop 13 use the symbol of the "vulnerable homeowner" to institutionalize permanent fiscal scarcity, and how does this affect affordable housing production today?*
- Required:
- **Stone**, Chapter 3 ("Efficiency")
- Discussion Slides
- Case Study: Core Issue 2: The Weaponization of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
- ***Discussion Prompt:** Why does a progressive supermajority in Sacramento struggle to pass supply-side housing legislation, and how does the Polis measure 'efficiency' in housing policy differently than a pure market?*
- 📌 In-Class: Complete weekly Policy Advocacy Workbook section (Submit one proposed question for the Oct 6 City Council Housing Forum).
Week 3: Federalism and the Foundations of State Governance
- Required:
- Case Study: Core Issue 3: Development Impact Fees and the Shadow of Proposition 13
- ***Discussion Prompt:** How does stacking multiple, uncoordinated social mandates onto local agencies impede their capacity to construct affordable housing and manage homelessness?*
- Capital Fellows Program
- Required:
- Case Study: Core Issue 4: Financing Complexity and "Capital Stacking" in Affordable Housing
- ***Discussion Prompt:** Is local zoning control over housing density an expression of authentic participatory democracy (the Polis), or a structural mechanism of elite wealth preservation?*
- 📌 In-Class: Complete weekly Policy Advocacy Workbook section (Submit one proposed question for the Oct 6 City Council Housing Forum).
- ⭐ Extra Credit (1 point): Our Immigrant Neighbors Speaker Series
Sunday, Sept. 13 @ 4pm | United Methodist Church of Westlake Village (1049 S. Westlake Blvd, Westlake Village, CA 91361)
Immigration attorney Vanessa Frank presents on current immigration law and policy.
Week 4: State Constitutions and the Politics of Numbers
- Required:
- Case Study: Core Issue 5: Hard Construction Costs, Labor Economics, and Prescriptive Codes
- ***Discussion Prompt:** Can California effectively plan and fund multi-decade affordable housing infrastructure when its tax revenues experience wild boom-and-bust cycles?*
- Required:
- **OSU OER**, Chapter 6 (cont.); PPIC, "California’s Initiative Process: Then and Now."
- Case Study: Core Issue 6: Constitutional Roadblocks and the Legacy of Article 34
- ***Discussion Prompt:** How did the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) evolve into the primary legal weapon used by local neighborhood groups to block affordable and dense housing?*
- ⭐ Extra Credit (1 point): Candidates Forum for City of Thousand Oaks Councilmember
Thursday, September 17 from 6:00 pm – 8:00 pm | Lundring Events Center at California Lutheran University
The Chamber, the Acorn Newspapers and Cal Lutheran University are collaborating to host this forum. It will be moderated by Becca Whitnall (The Acorn Newspapers) and Dr. Haco Hoang (CLU).
- Required:
- **Stone**, Chapter 7 ("Numbers").
- Case Study: Core Issue 7: Layered Regulatory Mandates (Water Verification and Parking Minimums)
- ***Discussion Prompt:** How are numbers and statistics used strategically in the debate over state preemption of local zoning to frame the housing crisis as a failure of local government?*
- 📌 In-Class: Complete weekly Policy Advocacy Workbook section (Submit one proposed question for the Oct 6 City Council Housing Forum).
Week 5: Local Government and Bureaucracy
- Required:
- Case Study: Core Issue 8: The State-Local Power Struggle, Enforcement, and Social Housing
- ***Discussion Prompt:** How does stacking multiple, uncoordinated social mandates onto local agencies impede their capacity to construct affordable housing and manage homelessness?*
- Required:
- League of California Cities, "The Nature of Local Government"
- Case Study: Core Issue 9: Thousand Oaks & Ventura County Local Housing Reality
- ***Discussion Prompt:** Is local zoning control over housing density an expression of authentic participatory democracy (the Polis), or a structural mechanism of elite wealth preservation?*
- Required:
- Case Study: Housing & Homelessness
- ***Discussion Prompt:** How are numbers and statistics used strategically in the debate over state preemption of local zoning to frame the housing crisis as a failure of local government?*
- 📌 In-Class: Complete weekly Policy Advocacy Workbook section (Submit one proposed question for the Oct 6 City Council Housing Forum).
- ⭐ Extra Credit (1 point): Our Immigrant Neighbors Speaker Series
Sunday, Sept. 27 @ 4pm | United Methodist Church of Westlake Village (1049 S. Westlake Blvd, Westlake Village, CA 91361)
Willie Lubka of Buen Vecino discusses the effects of immigration policy on Ventura County individuals and families.
Week 6: Key Actors and Interests
- Required:
- Case Study: Housing & Homelessness
- ***Discussion Prompt:** In the Polis, how do we navigate the conflict between protecting existing neighborhood character and the urgent need to build high-density affordable housing?*
- Required:
- **Stone**, Chapter 9 ("Interests").
- Case Study: Housing & Homelessness
- ***Discussion Prompt:** Which interest groups wield the most power in local housing disputes, and how do they overcome the collective action problem compared to unhoused or prospective residents?*
- Required:
- **Stone**, Chapter 6 ("Symbols").
- Case Study: Housing & Homelessness
- ***Discussion Prompt:** How do political symbols associated with 'Silicon Valley tech wealth' versus 'unhoused encampments' shape the legislative debate over housing inequality?*
- 📌 In-Class: Complete weekly Policy Advocacy Workbook section (Submit one proposed question for the Oct 6 City Council Housing Forum).
Week 7: Midterm and Executives
- Midterm Examination
- Required:
- Case Study: Economy & Labor
- ***Discussion Prompt:** How can the Governor and local executives utilize their power to compel reluctant municipalities to meet their Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) targets?*
Week 8: Legislatures and Causes
- Required:
- Case Study: Economy & Labor
- ***Discussion Prompt:** What specific legislative and institutional mechanisms explain why California public agencies struggle to deliver affordable housing projects on time and on budget?*
- Required:
- **Stone**, Chapter 8 ("Causes").
- Case Study: Health & Safety Net
- ***Discussion Prompt:** How do competing political narratives attribute the 'causes' of homelessness to either individual moral failure or systemic housing shortages, and how does this affect policy solutions?*
- 📌 In-Class: Complete weekly Policy Advocacy Workbook section.
- Required:
- **Stone**, Chapter 15 ("Powers").
- Case Study: Housing & Homelessness
Week 9: Budgeting and Decisions
- Required:
- OSU OER, Chapter 11 ("Budgeting and Sustainability"); Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO), California’s Tax System: A Primer.
- Case Study: Housing & Homelessness
- Required:
- **Stone**, Chapter 11 ("Decisions").
- 📌 In-Class: Complete weekly Policy Advocacy Workbook section.
- Required:
Week 10: Rules, Welfare, and Traditional State Services
- Required:
- **Stone**, Chapter 13 ("Rules").
- Required:
- **Stone**, Chapter 4 ("Welfare & Security").
- 📌 In-Class: Complete weekly Policy Advocacy Workbook section.
- Required:
- OSU OER, Chapter 13 ("Traditional and Visible Services"); Severin Borenstein, "The Economics of California’s Energy Transition."
Week 11: Liberty, Surveillance, and Rights
- Required:
- **Stone**, Chapter 5 ("Liberty").
- [Placeholder: California FLOCK cameras]
- 📌 In-Class: Complete weekly Policy Advocacy Workbook section.
- Required:
- **Stone**, Chapter 14 ("Rights & Powers").
Week 12: Infrastructure, Inequality, and Decision-Making
- Required:
- **OSU OER**, Chapter 13 (cont.); Ethan Elkind, *Railtown: The Fight for the LA Metro Rail* (Excerpts).
- Required:
- 📌 In-Class: Complete weekly Policy Advocacy Workbook section.
- Required:
- **Stone**, Chapter 10 ("Decisions & Persuasion").
Week 13: Entitlements, Social Welfare, and Education Funding
- Required:
- Required:
- **Stone**, Chapter 4 ("Welfare"); LAO, An Overview of the Local Control Funding Formula.
- 📌 In-Class: Complete weekly Policy Advocacy Workbook section.
Week 14: Security and Social Welfare
- Required:
- **Stone**, Chapter 5 ("Security").
Week 15: Political Causes and Final Examination
- Required:
- **Stone**, Chapter 8 ("Causes")
- Final Examination
Finals Week
- Final Examination
- Required:
- *No Class (Finals Week)*
- *No Class (Finals Week)* 📌 Final Examination.